- Chris Hughes is the cofounder of Facebook and the cofounder of the Economic Security Project.
- He is advocating for a guaranteed monthly income of $500 for working Americans who are part of households making less than $50,000 a year.
- The initiative is aimed at growing the economy by bringing money to impoverished communities and encouraging work, even when jobs are low-paying.
- This post is part of Business Insider’s ongoing series on Better Capitalism.
Chris Hughes helped his Harvard roommate Mark Zuckerberg launch Facebook. Though his three years of work on the project earned him just 2% of the company, that 2% made him very rich.
After Facebook went public in 2012, Hughes cashed in and suddenly found himself with half a billion dollars.
It was a much more dramatic version of a feeling he first felt in 2008, when he sold his first tranche of stock for $1 million. He was officially wealthy.
Rising from solidly middle class to the upper level of American society caused him to reconsider his role in the world, he explained in a recent interview for Business Insider’s podcast “Success! How I Did It.” It’s been the main catalyst for his latest venture: working toward bringing a basic income to 60 million Americans.
You can listen to the full episode below.
Under Hughes’ plan, laid out in his new book “Fair Shot“:
- “Government should provide a guaranteed income of $500 a month to every adult who lives in a household making less than $50,000 per year and who is working in some way.”
- Included in the definition of “worker” are those taking care of young children or an impaired aging adult full time, or adults in college full-time.
- A tax on the richest Americans. Hughes defines those as people $250,000 or more a year, and suggests this group would have income in their highest tax bracket taxed at 50%.
- Dollar amounts for both the monthly check and the $50,000 or less requirement would be subject to adjustment based on a state’s population.
- It would cost the federal government $290 billion, making it the fourth-largest federal social benefit.
- He is open to starting with a guaranteed income of as little as $150 per month.
While the plan can still be considered “radical” depending on your politics, Hughes considers it a “modest” alternative to a universal basic income (UBI), in which every citizen receives a guaranteed income.
“So UBI is a big-picture ideal that motivates a lot of people, including myself, to think about 2030, 2040, in the future,” he told us. “Today, however, I think a guaranteed income of $500 a month to people who make $50,000 or less — so a more modest starter version, if you will — is what’s most required. And that’s because I believe that a guaranteed income is the most powerful way to combat income inequality.”
Hughes portrays the idea not as an act of charity, but as a way to grow the economy by reviving impoverished communities and encouraging employment — this belief is supported by research from the Roosevelt Institute, though under a different form of a guaranteed income.
While Hughes’ version of a guaranteed income is coming from a liberal perspective, there are other versions from the right — particularly among libertarian thinkers — that would look similar to Hughes’ plan. In alternate proposals, that money would come not from a tax increase, but from the reduction of other federal welfare programs.
His main vehicle for his advocacy is his Economic Security Project think tank, which he cofounded in 2016. It is already working with the mayor of Stockton, California on a guaranteed income experiment designed to bring new energy to the community and lower unemployment by rewarding work when it would otherwise seem like an endless struggle.
Hughes told us that in the last couple years he’s been reflecting on the strange turn of events in his life that began with the luck of being Zuckerberg’s roommate.
He said: “As a result, I made a boatload of money for three years’ worth of work, and as much as people might want to see the American dream in that, I actually think it’s indicative of the fact that a small number of people are getting extremely lucky, while 99% of everybody else is working hard and is having a harder and harder time to make ends meet, and we have the power to change it.”