TOP CEO: Bringing money back from overseas could help rebuild our ‘crumbling nation’

But that’s only if Congress can “get off their high horse” and pass a repatriation bill, which would allow US companies with money overseas to bring it back at a lower rate.

Opponents of such a bill equate it with rewarding bad behavior. But Duffy has an different interpretation.

In an interview with Business Insider, Duffy said a repatriation bill could bring back $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion back to the states. Depending on the tax rate, that likely translates into hundreds of billions in tax revenues.

According to Duffy, that money could be put to work to rebuild America.

Here’s the relevant passage from the interview:

Turner: Let’s talk about repatriation. There are a lot of companies with a lot of money overseas. How do you expect that to play out?

Duffy: I have been an advocate for a repatriation bill for the last five to 1o years. I just think it needs to be done. Now I understand how some political folks might think that it’s opening Pandora’s box and we will just be condoning bad behavior.

Everybody who circumvented our laws to go hide money, to not pay the government, we are going to reward them by saying you can come back at a rate that’s reasonable. That’s been the argument. I get it. But at the same time, when we have a crumbling nation, I think that you have to make decisions and get off of your high horse and say, “You know what, it is what it is sometimes.”

We’ve got $20 trillion in debt already, we’ve got anywhere from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion that could come back here if we bring it back at a rate that’s reasonable. If we take X amount and put it into an infrastructure bill that goes anywhere from $600 billion to $1.5 trillion, we could probably do a pretty good job at rebuilding parts of America without adding to the national debt. I think that is important, and politicians need to come to grips with that.

You know what I relate it to? I don’t want to be sophomoric about this. When they legalized marijuana and it’s still so controversial, it could still be harmful or could lead to people using other drugs, but a bunch of states still legalized it, why is that so different from this? You know what I mean? I don’t want to draw a bad analogy, but I think there’s a point where people need to say, “It’s there. They’re doing it anyway.”

The paperwork costs us more to arrest these people than the harm of the drug, so just allow this to happen and be done with it. And if you lower the tax rate, we don’t have to worry about it going overseas any more. It is a two-step process that needs to be done.

Read the whole interview here.